The Trials of Socrates
The Trials of Socrates:Socrates is considered to be the founding father of the western philosophy. He was one of the classical Greek philosophers who could cherish and champion the concept of philosophy to the next level of performance. He was born in 469 BC in a very simple based background in the state of Athens. His father was a stone carver translating to a low income based family but this could not stop Socrates from cherishing and championing the modern classical western philosophy to totality. His fellow philosophers include Plato and Aristotle. In this feedback essay paper, a critical analysis has been done to address the questions of the significance or importance of Socrates’ two digressions in Apology and Would Socrates’ defense have been better off without these two digressions?
———————————–Middle of paper———————————
Socrates as an individual on realistic terms could not challenge the accusations based on him from the angry Athenians who saw no potentiality in him but instead a misleader with the society. This made the philosopher to contemplate on being realistic and if death awaited him for such a mind then he could lose nothing at all. Conclusively, this is another reason as to why Socrates stood firm to the principles of reality by being factual to the court thus the court ruling at the long run.
Plato, Grube, G. M. A., & Cooper, J. M. (2000). The trial and death of Socrates: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, death scene from Phaedo. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub.
Are you ready to order an essay from us ?Place your order