The Maze of Moral Relativism

The Maze of Moral Relativism

The Maze of Moral Relativism

The Maze of Moral Relativism:The questions posed here is whether there are basis to trust in the likelihood of having a collection of normative moral principles, which are unanimous to all human experience, autonomously of nationality, culture, and so on.

………………………………………….middle of paper……………………………

As Boghossian explicates, normative principles are ones that tell people how things are supposed to be, contrary to the way things actually are. He states that people should discard moral absolutes, even as they keep their moral convictions, accepting that there may be right and wrong in relation to different moral codes, but no wrong and right in isolation.

Boghossian’s absolutism arguments is inadequate to modify a moral relativist’s position. Moral relativists believe their principles are a function of things like genes, individual background, and culture. Most relativist don’t think that Boghossian’s view helps them to be more accepting to other moral views than they would otherwise be.

References
Boghossian, P. (July 24, 2011). The Maze of Moral Relativism. The New York Time.

Do you need to sample other essays ?Check out all our blog posts where we have a wide variety of topics e.g Ballad of the Landlord Langston Hughes

Are you ready to order a custom essay from us ?Place your order

  • Length: 332 Words (1)
  • Rating:Better Essays
  • Price: $5