The Mandatory Minimum sentencing laws and its effects
The Mandatory Minimum sentencing laws and its effects:Federal mandatory minimum sentencing laws assert that incarceration or execution following criminal conviction. These statues deal with drug trafficking; federal officials’ assassination and use of a firearm to commit a federal crime. In additional these laws circumscribe judicial sentencing discretion, though they impose few limitations depending on prosecutorial discretion or the pardon power of the president. Mandatory minimum sentencing laws have been criticized as inconsiderately harsh and unsuited with a rational sentencing guideline system, but they are embraced as hallmarks of truth in sentencing and means of incapacitating dangerous criminals. This paper seek to discuss mandatory minimum sentencing laws and its effects in the American society (Ulmer, Kurlychek, and Kramer 441).
———————————Middle of paper——————————
There is an increasing concern that mandatory minimum might be imposed disproportionately on members of the minority groups. Mandatory minimum sentences laws lead to declining in crime level in the US, where states with the greatest increases in the rate of incarceration tend to experience decline in crime level. States with crime rate above average have an increased prison population and have registered a decline in crime level as dangerous criminals are isolated from the community.
Bjerk, David. “Making the Crime Fit the Penalty: The Role of Prosecutorial Discretion under Mandatory Minimum Sentencing*.” Journal of Law and Economics 48.2 (2005): 591- 625.
Do you need to sample other essays ?Check out all our blog posts where we have a wide variety of topics e.g Smooth Harley Tarriff Act/Government Intervention/Birth of WTO
Are you ready to order an essay from us ?Place your order