Information has directly or indirectly led to more deaths in the world than any other thing. Humanity is not mature enough to handle all information at their will, and thus, restrictions need to be put in order to regulate their actions. It might seem absurd, but it is the grim reality. Free speech has been fought for in efforts of improving our liberal nation but has only acted as a trigger to many conflicts.
Free speech among people is commonly mix with hate speech thus infringing other people’s rights. Additionally, the effortlessness with which an opinion can spark international conflict creates the need for reviewing new regulation. Thus, as a tenet of civil liberties, free speech is embraced in America, protected by Article 19. The courts use the First Amendment, which regulates defamatory statements on, religion, the government, sexuality, gender and race (Barendt, 2007). In America, hate speech is presumably in defense by the 1st Amendment.
—————————————Middle of paper—————————
We must rethink our regulation and control over free speech to prevent potential conflict caused by opinions. Since there is a thin line between free speech and where it infringes another person’s rights, reviewing policies on free speech is requirement. The effortlessness with which an opinion can spark international conflict creates the need for reviewing new regulation. With that observed, information will not cause further deaths.
Barendt, E. M. (2007). Freedom of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sadurski, W. (2002). Freedom of speech and its limits. Dordrecht [u.a.: Kluwer.
Warburton, N. (2009). Free speech: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Are you ready to order a custom essay from us ? Place your order with us today.