In the book: The third side: why we fight and how we can stop, William Ury starts the introduction by stating “No more important challenge faces us today than how to deal with our differences (William, 2000).” Ury goes on to suggest that the people’s differences are resolved by fighting. He points out the tendency of most individuals to result to coercive force in an effort to determine conflicts.
In response to the assumption that “there is no other way for conflict resolution but violence,” the author suggests the third side. This style presents a new way to perceive conflict around us.
………………………..Middle of paper………………………
It ensures that it restores the balance by upcoming with a win-win condition for all the disgruntled parties in any form of conflict. This way it poses a “triple win.” The model can attain this since it incorporates both the insiders and the outsiders. The insiders are the friends, family and also the parties involved in the conflict.
On the other hand, the outsiders are the bystanders, neighbors and those who are neutrals. It is this holistic view appreciated by the Third side proposition that makes Ury’s view more efficient and appellate in conflict resolution. It may be a recent approach, but it is fancied over other models of conflict resolution presented in the past.
William U., (2000). The Third Side: Why We Fight and How We Can Stop. New York: Penguin Books.